ATLAS AGENA ROCKET DEPRESSURIZES ON PAD, COLLAPSES AND TEARS ITSELF TO PIECES
What You Haven't Seen0 HN recommenders · 2020–2026
269K views · news · evergreen · Uploaded 2017-11-24
A one-minute clip of an Atlas Agena rocket losing pressure on the pad and collapsing. The Atlas relied on tank pressurization for structural integrity, so a simple failure tore it apart.
Commenters cite it as vivid proof that pressure-stabilized rocket tanks can fail catastrophically when pressure is lost.
9:31Around The Corner - How Differential Steering Works (1937)
US Auto Industry
1:21:22Light Years Ahead | The 1969 Apollo Guidance Computer
TNMoC
32:35Detergent packs are kinda wishy-washy (Dishwashers Explained)
Technology Connections
41:53Mechanical Computer (All Parts) - Basic Mechanisms In Fire Control Computers
Excelsior10000
18:28The Antique Toaster that's Better than Yours
Technology Connections
23:32The Solar Gravitational Lens will Map Exoplanets. Seriously.
Launch Pad Astronomy
19:43U.S. NAVY BASIC MECHANISMS OF FIRE CONTROL COMPUTERS MECHANICAL COMPUTER INSTRUCTIONAL FILM 27794
PeriscopeFilm
11:39The Ingenious Design of the Aluminum Beverage Can
engineerguy
4 comments from Hacker News
For the record, a couple Atlas rockets did crumble under their own weight due to unexpected loss of pressure: [VIDEO] And some Atlas missiles on display are still being pressurized to this day: [LINK] Like really, there is a compressor next to the rocket that keeps constant pressure inside against the slight leaks. Pretty impressive for 40-50 old rocket left outside exposed to the elements to be still this airtight. :)
I think it is implied in the article that only the motor is massive enough to excavate a crater. The similarity in size of the craters suggests they were created by objects of similar mass. At least one early rocket design (Atlas) had fuel tanks so insubstantial that they had to be pressurized until they were loaded with fuel on the pad, and a loss of pressure could be expensive... [VIDEO]
Yes, the Centaur upper stage was and still is using balloon tanks. I think this is the failure you're referring to: [VIDEO] And here's a picture from ULA/Tony Bruno showing a Centaur tank in their factory, being supported by a rig: [LINK]
The vehicle is designed to hold all that fuel, plus whatever payload it carries on top, but it's not designed to have heavy loads attached to it in any other way. Rockets are so intensely optimized for weight that sometimes they're barely strong enough to stand upright if you fuel them the wrong way: [VIDEO] .