Why this British crossroads was so dangerous
Tom Scott3 HN recommenders · 2020–2025
3.9M views · explainer · evergreen · Uploaded 2020-04-27
Tom Scott explains why Ipley Cross in England's New Forest was one of Britain's most dangerous junctions. The angled crossroads lets a car's A-pillar hide approaching traffic and cyclists because there is no relative motion in the driver's view.
Used as the go-to visual demonstration of A-pillar blind spots and badly designed junctions.
54:37How Self-Driving Cars will Destroy Cities (and what to do about it)
Not Just Bikes
54:20Bret Victor - Inventing on Principle
Rui Oliveira
18:14Stroads are Ugly, Expensive, and Dangerous (and they're everywhere) [ST05]
Not Just Bikes
17:03Why This Channel Exists (and why I hate Houston)
Not Just Bikes
9:39Why American Cities Are Broke - The Growth Ponzi Scheme [ST03]
Not Just Bikes
11:09The Wrong Way to Set Speed Limits [ST06]
Not Just Bikes
37:54Mike Monteiro: F*ck You, Pay Me
CreativeMornings HQ
17:08Cities Aren't Loud: Cars Are Loud
Not Just Bikes
10 comments from Hacker News
The Tom Scott video has a good animation on this: [VIDEO] Because of the layout of the junction the cars are actually approaching from behind the cyclists.
For a particularly dramatic example of this, Tom Scott made a video about an intersection in the UK that's poorly designed for visibility: [VIDEO]
Sounds to me like cars shouldn't be allowed to drive where pedestrians travel, if they can't really avoid driving people over. Edit: This Tom Scott video shows how a cyclist can be perfectly occluded by the A-pillar while both are moving [VIDEO]
> The angles we were converging at meant that he basically disappeared into the background because there was no relative motion. This effect is demonstrated in this video about a particularly dangerous crossing in the UK: [VIDEO]
The Wired reporting is based on Bez's article on Singletrack (as stated): [LINK] Tom Scott made a good complementary video about this: [VIDEO] It's already fixed just last month: [LINK] and [LINK]
The blind spots in the article are from the A pillar, which isn’t addressed by rear view mirrors. The momentum would tend toward this being solved by sensors/computer vision, but maybe chip shortages have curtailed that. Tom Scott presented an interesting example of A pillar blind spots causing problems: [VIDEO]
Tom Scott has a good video for anyone looking for a visual of this phenomenon: [VIDEO] He shows off a rural (and thankfully now fixed) crossroads in the UK with seemingly great visibility and an unusually high rate of cyclist fatalities - the roads are at such an angle that any reckless driving speed can align with a reasonable cycling speed such that the driver's door pillar can block visibility of a cyclist with right of way right up to the point of impact - and it's compounded by the fact that the car is necessarily approaching from behind the cyclist, so a passing cyclist will be unaware of the danger possibly until they get hit. Of course if drivers in the area actually followed the stop signs no one would get hit - but if you watch the video in a five minute period genuinely only about half of the cars passing through actually come to a complete stop at the stop sign. You need more than signage and quietly hoping that people to do the right thing.
this article seems to have some actual pictures: [LINK] the previous configuration as shown on the satellite image looks a lot like the intersection Tom Scott made a video about, where the intersecting road is angled to keep cross-traffic hidden behind a car's a-pillar. [VIDEO]
See [VIDEO] for an example. One of the advantages of raking the front windshield for aerodynamics is changing the geometry for the A pillar to be more sideways instead of vertical, allowing a bit more hope of seeing something.
Example of an insideously unsafe intersection that was changed to make it safer (for bike riders): [VIDEO] How it was fixed: [LINK]