Autonomous Car - what goes into sensing for autonomous driving?
Mobileye1 HN recommenders · 2016–2016
40K views · talk · dated · Uploaded 2016-04-17
Mobileye co-founder and CTO Amnon Shashua explains what goes into sensing for autonomous driving and whether end-to-end deep learning can work for it. He argues for decomposing the problem.
Recommended as an accessible technical explanation of Mobileye's approach, and also cited in disputes over Tesla Autopilot.
54:37How Self-Driving Cars will Destroy Cities (and what to do about it)
Not Just Bikes
48:10Bay Area Vision Meeting: Unsupervised Feature Learning and Deep Learning
Google TechTalks
52:22Google Self-Driving Car Project | SXSW Interactive 2016
SXSW
41:18"Voice Driven Development: Who needs a keyboard anyway?" by Emily Shea
Strange Loop Conference
30:09Andrej Karpathy - AI for Full-Self Driving at Tesla
Matroid
2:35:53Tensorflow and deep learning - without a PhD by Martin Görner
Devoxx
15:12JPEG DCT, Discrete Cosine Transform (JPEG Pt2)- Computerphile
Computerphile
18:31Fourier Optics used for Optical Pattern Recognition
Huygens Optics
4 comments from Hacker News
Here is a great, very accessible video where the CTO of MobileEye (which provides some of the components for Tesla's "autopilot") explains his views on the challenges of end-to-end learning for autonomous vehicles, and why it's preferable to decompose the problem instead (still using deep learning for the decomposed modules). [VIDEO] I'm inclined to agree, especially because it helps in 1) providing diagnostic information (such as the great driving visualizations shown in the video), and 2) makes it easier to incorporate algorithms and sensors (like with Google's cars) as a redundancy in case the neural network hits a crazy edge case.
ugh, more ME noise. so ME has a lot of evidence that they are lying through their teeth, if they were so worried why let all the other brands do the hands free thing? [LINK] * ME boasting about their tech making hands free possible [VIDEO]
/r/TeslaMotors dug up this video[1] of MobilEye CEO talking about the Autopilot, so if they really disagreed with the usage of Autopilot, shouldn't they have brought that up prior, and not included it in promotional material. From all indications on their end, I believe that they said that the Tesla Autopilot shouldn't be driven hands-free. I have no qualms with that, but why then use the Autopilot as a promotional feature for their products? Not trying to fanboy with Tesla here, as I do think that MobilEye was right in pulling their products away from Tesla. [1]: [VIDEO]
Those are good points. Here's some backup. Here's Mobileeye's CTO talking in detail about their technology.[1] They use a a deep neural network that recognizes cars. Just cars. Look at this point in the video.[2] There's a stationary obstacle on the left, and it doesn't recognize that. Maybe this is why Tesla, using Mobileye hardware, plowed into three different stationary vehicles at the left of a highway. They were all trucks (one was a street sweeper), and seen from the back while stationary, may not have matched the trained model of "car". Mobileeye's algorithms are good at recognizing moving cars from most angles, and that's valuable for feeding into the model of "what's the other player doing". But it's not enough for the "where are all the obstacles" and "where is the road surface" questions. Those questions have objective answers, which can be answered with a LIDAR, and maybe millimeter radar if it has the angular resolution. [1] [VIDEO] [2] [VIDEO]