How we take back the internet | Edward Snowden
TED0 HN recommenders · 2014–2018
3.4M views · interview · dated · Uploaded 2014-03-19
Edward Snowden appears by telepresence robot at TED2014 to discuss surveillance, privacy rights, and Internet freedom, interviewed by Chris Anderson with Tim Berners-Lee.
Mostly referenced in debates about Snowden and surveillance rather than recommended; some commenters criticize his statements.
1:00:43Jim Simons (full length interview) - Numberphile
Numberphile2
14:34Steve Jobs Stanford Commencement Speech 2005
JoshuaG
57:19Republic, Lost | Lawrence Lessig | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
21:08Christopher Hitchens - Free Speech
hitch archive
1:07:26Alan Kay - Normal Considered Harmful
powerfuloutlet
53:31Growing a Language, by Guy Steele
Bill Pugh
1:01:40A Philosophy of Software Design | John Ousterhout | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
42:50Defcon 18 Changing threats to privacy Moxie Marlinspike Part
killab66661
3 comments from Hacker News
I think this is a response to the recent TED talk where the same question was asked: [VIDEO] The host provides the theory that the vote is not biased based on left or right wing beliefs.
Your own link contradicts your definition: In the field of counterintelligence, a double agent (also double secret agent) is an employee of a secret intelligence service, whose primary purpose is to spy on a different target organization, but who, in fact, is a member of the target organization. In other words, if Snowden worked for the NSA and spied on China or Russia, but at the same time was passing information over to China or Russia, he would then be a double agent. That's why it's so fishy when he repeatedly says that he specifically used to work on Chinese targets (for example: [1]), chose to flee the US and go to China, and his 3rd leak in the news was giving a Chinese newspaper a list of all of Chinese computers that had been targeted by the NSA[2]. That doesn't mean he's a double-agent, but it certainly raises some eyebrows... [1] [VIDEO] [2] [LINK]
O like the faceless judges that grant thousands of warrants? There's no accountability and it's absolutely criminal. [VIDEO]