A politicians logic
TrabiRobert0 HN recommenders · 2017–2026
177K views · comedy · evergreen · Uploaded 2008-03-15
A very short clip from Yes, Prime Minister in which Sir Arnold and Sir Humphrey run through a piece of circular political reasoning. It is the origin of the so-called politician's logic.
HN uses it as a joke reference to the politician's fallacy, to mock reasoning of the form 'something must be done, this is something, so do it'.
58:58George Lakoff: Moral Politics
University of California Television (UCTV)
12:01Why Electronic Voting Is Still A Bad Idea
Tom Scott
57:19Republic, Lost | Lawrence Lessig | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
7:22Antonin Scalia - On American Exceptionalism
AmericanRhetoric.com
51:22USENIX Security '18-Q: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible?
USENIX
1:02:38The Cardboard Box Reform - Nixon's Ghost Bill & A Crucial Flaw in Democracy
CRI
2:58The Loving Trap
Ben Woodhams
57:38The Coming Collapse of the Middle Class with Elizabeth Warren
University of California Television (UCTV)
3 comments from Hacker News
The politician's fallacy: "Something must be done. This is something. Therefore we must do it. But doing the wrong thing is worse than doing nothing." [VIDEO]
> legislation is kind of the point of a government in the first place I would personally consider legislation to be but one means to an end, with the point of a (democratic) government actually being to ensure stability and prosperity for its citizens. In that framework, "leading with legislation" doesn't make any sense—you can lead with results, but the legislation is not itself a result! Lead with development or lead with standard of living or lead with civil rights, but don't lead with legislation. Your formulation sounds like politician's logic: "something must be done, this is something, therefore we must do it". Legislation as an end in itself. Very interesting. [VIDEO]
Ignoring all the tedious 'no, you're a bad person for having different priorities and beliefs to me' comments that this will inevitably inspire, I have to ask: why does the operating system need to be involved in this? The intended target of the regulation seems to be app stores. Someone has fallen victim to Politician's Logic: [VIDEO]