John Mearsheimer: Israel-Palestine, Russia-Ukraine, China, NATO, and WW3 | Lex Fridman Podcast #401
Lex Fridman0 HN recommenders · 2023–2024
8.3M views · interview · dated · Uploaded 2023-11-17
A three-and-a-half-hour Lex Fridman interview with international relations scholar John Mearsheimer. He discusses war and power politics, covering Israel-Palestine, Russia-Ukraine, China, NATO, and the risk of a larger war.
HN commenters cite it as a representative statement of Mearsheimer's realist views, such as anarchy among nation-states and Russia seeking early peace talks.
1:29:11This Is What Winning Looks Like (Full Length)
VICE
1:00:22Tiedustelueverstin arvio Venäjästä | 3.12.2018
fin_topsu
5:43The EU Has Orbits, and the UK Fell Out of All of Them
CGP Grey
1:31:53Gwynne Dyer -- Geopolitics in a Hotter World
The University of British Columbia
1:53:04Vladimir Pozner: How the United States Created Vladimir Putin
Yale University
15:29Dr Shashi Tharoor MP - Britain Does Owe Reparations
OxfordUnion
40:0238C3 - From Silicon to Sovereignty: How Advanced Chips are Redefining Global Dominance
media.ccc.de
46:05Timothy Snyder: The Making of Modern Ukraine. Class 1: Ukrainian Questions Posed by Russian Invasion
YaleCourses
3 comments from Hacker News
There is something oddly nostalgic about foreign policy pre-smartphone. People could hide in the shadows, spies didn't sit in offices all day, deals were made in cigar smoke without the fear of out-of-context leaks to twitter. People from that era are still giving interviews though: [VIDEO]
At the level of nation-states, there is an anarchistic relationship between one another. There's no real concept of legality at an international level when you peel away all the bureaucratic nonsense. John J. Mearsheimer touches on this briefly in his interview with Lex Fridman: [VIDEO] The permanent members of the UN's Security Council do not abide by laws they force other members to abide by. This is because there really are great powers in the world, which, despite being difficult for people in the West to understand, is very obvious in the rest of the world.
>> So it's sad to see anyone falling for Putin's lies so easily. (See also Mearshimer.) Mearsheimer can be a bit too convincing for his own good, surely. What he has argued that is certainly convincing is that Russia was ready to negotiate a peace at the start of the war, when Russians and Ukrainians met in Belarus and then in Istanbul. If Putin wanted to recreate Imperial Russia, or the Soviet Union, then why would he negotiate for peace? That's Mearsh's argument, which he articulates, e.g. here in Lex Friedman's show (sorry, I couldn't find a better source): [VIDEO] Full transcript here: [LINK]