Intel - Anti-Competitive, Anti-Consumer, Anti-Technology.
AdoredTV3 HN recommenders · 2017–2023
257K views · commentary · dated · Uploaded 2017-07-26
AdoredTV's history of Intel's monopolistic behavior over three decades, covering its dealings with AMD and its anti-consumer practices.
Recommended as an overview of Intel's anti-competitive past and why it kept dominating despite AMD's competitive products.
1:24:13Micro Men - 720p (2009)
gimpymoo
6:538-bit computer update
Ben Eater
1:21:22Light Years Ahead | The 1969 Apollo Guidance Computer
TNMoC
27:25“Hello, world” from scratch on a 6502 — Part 1
Ben Eater
56:09Project Code Rush - The Beginnings of Netscape / Mozilla Documentary
The Documentary Network
42:29YouTube's copyright system isn't broken. The world's is.
Tom Scott
47:52Finding the Missing Memristor - R. Stanley Williams
The Qualcomm Institute
1:00:56Winners Take All | Anand Giridharadas | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
6 comments from Hacker News
I watched this video yesterday, and it seems to explain a lot about how Intel has been less focused on building better technology in the last 10-15 years: [VIDEO] I'm not sure how balanced the viewpoint in the video is, but the author comes up with a lot of references.
This is a very good overview of bad anti-consumer practices Intel has done throughout the last 30 years: [VIDEO]
I'm not sure what you mean. From the time AMD released the K7 'Athlon' CPU, until the time Intel released Core2, AMD was king of performance. That's a long spawn of time. To understand why Intel kept selling CPUs like pancakes despite this, check this out: [VIDEO]
I assume you mean Linus from YouTubes "Linus Tech Tips", and not Linus Torvalds. Surprised you wouldn't clarify that considering what website this is. Considering Intel's history, I wouldn't bet they direct their efforts based on a YouTube reviewer. Also, considering Intels very anti-competitive behavior (e.g [0], [1], [2]), I am wary of stating Intel entering the DDR industry will make it any less corrupt. [0]: [LINK] [1]: [LINK] [2]: [VIDEO]
>AMD failed to capture the market despite making tremendous gains and legitimizing itself. Because Intel played dirty and illegal[0]. [0]: [VIDEO]
I'd still just buy the AMD gpu. Mature drivers, and better tested alongside AMD cpus. Also, I never liked Intel[0]. 0. [VIDEO]