Dear America... | David Mitchell's SoapBox

Aside from Apple vs Google, David Mitchell discusses this curious form of expression with graphs and what-not: [VIDEO]

It's "couldn't care less". When you say "could care less" you are endorsing the claim of American Kids Getting Dumber. If you still don't get it: [VIDEO]

> I could care less, ... I don't want to be "that guy" and I'm not trying to be a grammar Nazi. I know this is now an idiom in the USA, and therefore it doesn't have to make sense. However ... I've now heard it said, in four different countries, that this phrase makes the speaker sound like an idiot. I know it's now just "the norm" in the USA, but I wanted to let people here know that saying this makes a bad impression. If you don't care how you sound to non USAians then don't bother. But if you're wondering what I'm talking about, David Mitchell does an excellent job of explaining "I couldn't care less" [VIDEO] I now return you to your normal programming.

"I could care less if this is open source" David Mitchell explains why this phrase makes no sense and means exactly that opposite of what you want to say: [VIDEO]

>Meanwhile, 50 million people could care less what's inside an iPad. I assume you mean ' couldn't care less'. [1] [1] [VIDEO]

But "I could care less" is a perfectly grammatical sentence, which has a semantic meaning, which, as David Mitchell explains at comic length, is the opposite of what the speaker means to say. [VIDEO]

I think we agree with each other. Words like "ain't" entering the common lexicon (usually in spoken english) is fine by me ie. Words formed out of contractions of other words/phrases, or entirely new inventions. What I mostly get riled up about are words or phrases that are just plain wrong, but that have been used so widely that some dictionaries have accepted them as correct. Eg: [VIDEO]

In the simplest case, the thing referred to is 'a think', and they're entirely equivalent :) I'd argue that this is more of an Eggcorn[1] than a malapropism, unlike your second example. "The proof is in the pudding", or the classic "Could care less"[2] are the two worst offenders I can think of immediately. [1] [LINK] [2] [VIDEO]

On another note. Dear Americans, the queen would like you to stop saying "could care less" - by David Mitchell of Peep Show [VIDEO]

FYI "I could care less" is probably not what you meant. It's "couldn't care less" [1]. [1] [VIDEO]

It's also a nonsensical expression which some English speakers (rather good-naturedly) find bothersome, as comedian David Mitchell explains: [VIDEO]

Well, he is saying that he cares about it. Accidentally, by mangling an idiom, but still. I think David Mitchell has a thing about this? [VIDEO]

> The majority of the world doesn't speak English And yet here we are. To paraphrase David Mitchell ( [VIDEO] ), the problem is not so much the prevelance of American English, which in a lot of situations makes sense. eg. "sidewalk" makes a lot of sense, perhaps more, than "pavement" for the place that a pedestrian walks at the side of a road. "Parking lot" for a lot of land that is reserved for parking etc. The issue is that "could care less" means the opposite of what people intend them to mean, and they're just expecting the people listening to interpret what they mean.

I "could" care less about verbal flubs ;) Let David Mitchell explain, in a totally non sarcastic way [VIDEO]