Strange Spheres in Higher Dimensions - Numberphile
Numberphile2 HN recommenders · 2020–2025
767K views · explainer · evergreen · Uploaded 2017-09-18
Matt Parker on Numberphile explains the strange properties of spheres in higher dimensions, such as how they poke out of their bounding boxes. It uses Pythagoras to build intuition for 4D and beyond.
Recommended whenever the counterintuitive geometry of high-dimensional spheres comes up, including in vector embedding discussions.
9:52Vectors | Chapter 1, Essence of linear algebra
3Blue1Brown
19:42But what is the Fourier Transform? A visual introduction.
3Blue1Brown
18:40But what is a neural network? | Deep learning chapter 1
3Blue1Brown
24:26The Beauty of Bézier Curves
Freya Holmér
1:13:50The Continuity of Splines
Freya Holmér
1:00:43Jim Simons (full length interview) - Numberphile
Numberphile2
39:49Lec 1 | MIT 18.06 Linear Algebra, Spring 2005
MIT OpenCourseWare
25:16But how does bitcoin actually work?
3Blue1Brown
4 comments from Hacker News
Generalizations to higher dimensions[1] also have some fun properties. For one, the volume of a n-dimensional sphere (ball) goes to zero as n goes to infinity. But not in a trivial way: given a radius r, you can find the number of dimensions n that maximizes the volume of the n-sphere. For r=1 it's 5 dimensions, but for r=3 it's 55 dimensions. Numberphile[2] has a video on higher dimensional spheres which talks about this weirdness. [1]: [LINK] [2]: [VIDEO]
Oh they are very spike-y, well, my point in the above post is to just solve the eq but easier 'visualization' would be [0] By the way, this is a similar phenomena to the 'curse of dimensionality' [1] [0] [VIDEO] [1] [LINK]
Also not a topologist, but thought it was interesting after watching the video from the current top comment, [VIDEO] , where if you look at the size of the "contained sphere", 4D is the only place where the contained sphere is exactly tangent to the containing box. Lower than that, and it's easy to visualize how the contained sphere is smaller, higher than that, the contained sphere is always bigger. So seems like it might be a natural consequence that techniques that work at higher or lower dimensions don't work for the case in 4D where the sphere is exactly tangent.
There is a good numberphile video about that [VIDEO] It contains also a hilarious reference to the "parker circle:.