Bill Gates - Microsoft Antitrust Deposition - Highlights

Joe John1 HN recommenders · 2020–2022
330K views · other · evergreen · Uploaded 2018-11-03

A 39-minute highlights reel of Bill Gates being deposed by David Boies in the 1998 to 2001 United States v. Microsoft antitrust case.

HN cites it as a view of Gates evading questions and sparring with a top lawyer.

Watch on YouTube

3 comments from Hacker News

@DavidSJ2020 · in “Revisiting the spectacular failure that was the Bill Gates deposition”

Q: Okay. Let me ask you to look at Trial Exhibit 560. This is a message from you to Mr. Ballmer and Mr. Chase with a copy to Mr. Maritz and some other people also given copies dated August 15, 1997 at 4:07 p.m. on the subject of IBM and Netscape; correct? A: Uh-huh Q: BY MR. BOIES: And you type in here Importance: High." A: No. Q: No? A: No, I didn't type that. Q: Who typed in "High"? A: A computer. Q: A computer. Why did the computer type in "High"? A: It's an attribute of the e-mail. Q: And who set the attribute of the e-mail? A: Usually the sender sends that attribute. Q: Who is the sender here, Mr. Gates? A: In this case it appears I'm the sender. [LINK] [VIDEO]

@hammock2021 · in “Bill and Melinda Gates: America’s Top Farmland Owner”

I don't expect you to change your mind because confirmation bias is a powerful force. I did see this video recently and found it interesting. Have you seen it? "Bill Gates - Microsoft Antitrust Deposition - Highlights" [VIDEO]

RecommendsView on HN
@q7xvh97o2pDhNrh2022 · in “Google loses EU appeal and is fined a record $4B”

I found a highlights video: [VIDEO] (I see the full 11 hour deposition is also on YouTube, but I think I'll save that for another day.) So far, being 10 minutes in, I see a little bit of what you mean, but I haven't gotten to anything "unhinged" yet. He just seems like a bit of a smug nerd who's clearly enjoying going toe-to-toe with one of the country's top lawyers. Do you remember anything that jumped out for you from the deposition? I'd love to see more of what you're getting at.