Travis Oliphant: NumPy, SciPy, Anaconda, Python & Scientific Programming | Lex Fridman Podcast #224
Lex Fridman2 HN recommenders · 2021–2024
812K views · podcast · evergreen · Uploaded 2021-09-23
Lex Fridman interviews Travis Oliphant, creator of NumPy, SciPy and Anaconda, about scientific Python and its history. It runs about three hours.
Recommended as a firsthand history of how Python became the language of scientific computing and ML.
53:22Ruby Conf 12 - Y Not- Adventures in Functional Programming by Jim Weirich
Confreaks
2:25:52The spelled-out intro to neural networks and backpropagation: building micrograd
Andrej Karpathy
49:55How Python was Shaped by leaky Internals, Armin Ronacher, Flask framework
Видео с мероприятий {speach!
38:47RailsConf 2014 - All the Little Things by Sandi Metz
Confreaks
26:53What the heck is the event loop anyway? | Philip Roberts | JSConf EU
JSConf
19:09A Better Default Colormap for Matplotlib | SciPy 2015 | Nathaniel Smith and Stéfan van der Walt
Enthought
1:00:43Jim Simons (full length interview) - Numberphile
Numberphile2
14:34Steve Jobs Stanford Commencement Speech 2005
JoshuaG
4 comments from Hacker News
Because Python has NumPy, which implements vectorized math on arrays and matrices. Machine learning algorithms are implemented naturally and efficiently with those primitives. PyTorch, TensorFlow, and I think every other machine learning framework in Python all use NumPy. JavaScript, Ruby, and Perl either don't have this abstraction at all, or they have much weaker versions of it, and many fewer scientific libraries. NumPy started in the early 2000's and continues to this day. It takes decades to build up this infrastructure! This recent interview with NumPy creator Travis Oliphant is great: [VIDEO] He talks about how there were competing abstractions like "Numeric" and another library, and his goal with NumPy was to unify them. And how there are still some open design issues / regrets. There were multiple people in the nascent Python community who were tired of MATLAB, not just because it's proprietary, but because it's a weak and inefficient language for anything other than its scientific use cases. You won't have a good time trying to write a web app wrapper in MATLAB, for example. The much more recent Julia language is also inspired positively and negatively by MATLAB, and is very suitable for machine learning, though it doesn't have the decades of libraries that Python has. ----- The NumPy extension was in turn enabled by operator overloading in Python (which is actually a very C++ influenced mechanism). JavaScript doesn't have operator overloading; I'm pretty sure Perl
This episode of the lex fridman podcast gives a good overview of how python's scientific computing community developed. [VIDEO]
If in doubt, you can always check out the Lex Fridman podcast with Numpy creator Travis Oliphant: [VIDEO] They pronounce the "Py" as "pie".
Yup, I agree that Python composes like Unix does, which is a reason for its phenomenal growth: Narrow Waists Can Be Interior or Exterior: PyObject vs. Unix Files - [LINK] The appendix links to: Why is Python the language of machine learning? [LINK] In particular, I highly recommend this bit of history from NumPy creator Travis Oliphant: [VIDEO]