Lenses, Folds, and Traversals
Edward Kmett3 HN recommenders · 2013–2014
54K views · talk · evergreen · Uploaded 2012-12-20
Edward Kmett's talk to the NY Haskell User Group on the lens library, building from fmap and function composition up to lenses, folds and traversals. It shows how these composable combinators access and modify parts of data structures.
HN calls it dense but mind-blowing, the go-to way to understand lenses through algebraic derivation.
53:22Ruby Conf 12 - Y Not- Adventures in Functional Programming by Jim Weirich
Confreaks
49:55How Python was Shaped by leaky Internals, Armin Ronacher, Flask framework
Видео с мероприятий {speach!
42:03The Soul of Erlang and Elixir • Sasa Juric • GOTO 2019
GOTO Conferences
1:01:39"Simple Made Easy" - Rich Hickey (2011)
Strange Loop Conference
25:06"Making Impossible States Impossible" by Richard Feldman
elm-conf
1:31:06William Byrd on "The Most Beautiful Program Ever Written" [PWL NYC]
PapersWeLove
31:44The Value of Values with Rich Hickey
InfoQ
46:09Why Isn't Functional Programming the Norm? – Richard Feldman
Metosin
3 comments from Hacker News
If you want to work in an environment where a lot of people are thinking like this routinely, instead of a few lone voices in a vast sea of otherwise uninterested people, the Haskell community is doing a lot of work in this area, and able to move much faster since it's so much easier in Haskell than C++ templates (which isn't really a criticism of C++ templates, a lot of their capabilities are accidental rather than intended). This is why the Haskell community talks so much about monoids and applicatives and semigroups and a variety of other interesting structures in that area (and no, I did not forget to say monad, that structure is actually uninteresting here because it is too powerful). I believe the Fortress language is also doing some work here. A sample of the interesting sort of algorithm work that you can do when you think this way: [LINK] Edit: See also the Typeclassopedia: [LINK] And if you're really interested and want to take it hardcore, Edward Kmett's video on his lens library walks through how you can derive it with this sort of logic: [VIDEO]
"The best forms of language advocacy probably involve showing the great things you've done with a language and forgetting about comparisons to the competition." Great things the parent has done with the language: [VIDEO]
I found this talk by edward kmett incredibly helpful[0]. I kept rewatching parts of it bit by bit until I managed to absorb it all (there is a lot of information for a beginner) but I found it hugely helpful and mind-blowingly powerful. [0] [VIDEO]