Hunter S. Thompson meets a Hell's Angel, 1967 | CBC
CBC0 HN recommenders · 2014–2022
5.5M views · interview · evergreen · Uploaded 2010-07-07
A 1967 CBC clip in which Hunter S. Thompson faces a member of the Hell's Angels on television. The studio audience's reactions are a striking window into the era.
HN commenters cite it as evidence of how much social norms have shifted, given the audience's approval of jokes about domestic violence.
3:54:44The Century of the Self (Full Adam Curtis Documentary)
David Lessig
18:09Video explains the world's most important 6-sec drum loop
Landon Proctor
49:22James Burke Connections, Ep. 1 "The Trigger Effect"
DRS_Education
58:51DON'T PANIC — Hans Rosling showing the facts about population
Gapminder Foundation
44:02Music Theory and White Supremacy
Adam Neely
1:30:28AlphaGo - The Movie | Full award-winning documentary
Google DeepMind
29:21TIMELAPSE OF THE FUTURE: A Journey to the End of Time (4K)
melodysheep
2:23:07Alain de Botton: Status Anxiety
Alain de Botton
3 comments from Hacker News
To be fair, the Woody Allen joke is also allegorically about domestic violence and this updated version only reinforced those references, so I don't think your reaction was off base. For even more context, around the same time as the Woody Allen stand-up Hunter S. Thompson gets confronted on CBC by a member of Hells Angels. It shows in stark contrast how much society has matured in 50 years (at least regarding public acceptance of domestic violence). You should really watch the clip, but I've again excerpted choice quotes from the Hells Angels member that the audience reacts favorably to. (At 3:24 in the video) > Junkie George is beating his old lady. Junkie George's dog bit him. To me this is a personal feud. If a guy wants to beat his wife and his dog bites him, that's between the three of 'em. [Audience laughter and applause] and a short time later (5:42 in the video): > To keep a woman in line you got to beat her like a rug once in a while. [Again, audience laughter and applause] [VIDEO]
We really can not know this. We can only infer from cultures and religions in the relatively short timespan covered by written history. And even then, morality has changed significantly through time. A simple example - would you think that someone telling a story about someone else beating his wife to a pulp is something to laugh about? Here, check out how the audience reacts just a bit more than 50 years ago: [VIDEO] I think the only moral that may have been something close to universal throughout times would've been something like: "Don't kill a member of in-group without a good reason if you're not the head honcho." Everything else? We have literally no idea. EDIT: Really, watch the video, it actually applies to the discussion really well. It's basically an argument about morals.
You might enjoy this video from television, 1967: [VIDEO] Warning, the misogyny is off the charts. So weird to be watching something from 1967 and it feels like Jerry Springer.