Computers for Cynics 2 - It All Went Wrong at Xerox PARC
TheTedNelson1 HN recommenders · 2014–2023
23K views · commentary · evergreen · Uploaded 2012-05-28
Ted Nelson, in his Computers for Cynics series, gives a critical history of Xerox PARC's vision of personal computing. He lists what he sees as the limitations and wrong turns in PARC's approach to the desktop and documents.
HN readers treat it as a contrarian counterpoint to the usual PARC mythology, though one commenter noted a few apparent mistakes in it.
28:03AT&T Archives: Similiarities of Wave Behavior (Bonus Edition)
AT&T Tech Channel
1:24:13Micro Men - 720p (2009)
gimpymoo
1:00:43Jim Simons (full length interview) - Numberphile
Numberphile2
1:21:22Light Years Ahead | The 1969 Apollo Guidance Computer
TNMoC
14:34Steve Jobs Stanford Commencement Speech 2005
JoshuaG
54:20Bret Victor - Inventing on Principle
Rui Oliveira
41:53Mechanical Computer (All Parts) - Basic Mechanisms In Fire Control Computers
Excelsior10000
56:09Project Code Rush - The Beginnings of Netscape / Mozilla Documentary
The Documentary Network
3 comments from Hacker News
It's Ted Nelson rattling through some of his computer-history notes on camera. So it's good material, but it's much better presented in his enjoyable and reasonably-priced book /Geeks Bearing Gifts/ [LINK] . I noted a couple of apparent mistakes: at [VIDEO] Nelson says that Xerox paid Jobs to look at the PARC work, while AFAIK Apple in fact paid Xerox, in pre-IPO Apple stock. He also suggested that Xerox tried to bring in Jobs, when it seems to have been Apple who made the approach (at the instigation of Jef Raskin at Apple). [VIDEO] is misleading. PARC was more-or-less forbidden to buy a DEC PDP-10, which would have reflected badly on the competing machines from Xerox's new acquisition Scientific Data Systems, so PARC built a PDP-10 clone (the MAXC) in-house for their own use. That had very little to do with why they later designed and built the Altos: there was nothing remotely similar to an Alto out there that they could have bought (Nelson knows this).
Thank you. Nelson does a great job enumerating the limitations of PARC's vision and the capabilities absent from PARC's work. After being exposed to PARC's self-congratulatory self-promotion for decades, Nelson's history is a breath of fresh air. This is not to devalue what PARC accomplished, but that its accomplishments must be taken in perspective. It All Went Wrong at Xerox PARC is also on YouTube: [VIDEO]
This comment jogged my memory of a Ted Nelson video subtitled 'It all went wrong at Xerox PARC' : [VIDEO]