Episode 1 - Mongo DB Is Web Scale
gar1t0 HN recommenders · 2013–2026
1.2M views · comedy · evergreen · Uploaded 2010-08-27
A satirical animated dialogue in which a naive developer insists MongoDB is web scale while a database expert mocks him. It parodies the NoSQL versus relational debate.
Posted as a classic meme whenever MongoDB, NoSQL hype or tech fads come up.
40:20"Testing Distributed Systems w/ Deterministic Simulation" by Will Wilson
Strange Loop Conference
31:44The Value of Values with Rich Hickey
InfoQ
51:22USENIX Security '18-Q: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible?
USENIX
59:56AWS re:Invent 2018: Amazon DynamoDB Deep Dive: Advanced Design Patterns for DynamoDB (DAT401)
Amazon Web Services
2:58The Loving Trap
Ben Woodhams
47:43"Turning the database inside out with Apache Samza" by Martin Kleppmann
Strange Loop Conference
51:36Conflict Resolution for Eventual Consistency • Martin Kleppmann • GOTO 2016
GOTO Conferences
19:08NaN Gates and Flip FLOPS
suckerpinch
20 comments from Hacker News
I don't like MySQL either. But it's probably the perfect choice. Or perhaps you think something webscale[1] is required? [1] [VIDEO]
"Learn X in Y minutes" is an awesome concept! Let me know if you ever decide to run with it. I guess I don't fit the CoffeeScript is a hipster language profile very well but I still enjoy writing code in it ;) I basically agree with everything you've said (in both posts) ... you can be successful while wasting cycles. And if you're working on a low-volume and/or internal only application, you'll probably never face the limits of a modern server. If you need to operate "at web scale" [1], or run into an uncommon (or common) bug, you'll need to know more about the frameworks and systems you're code relies on (e.g. MongoDB configuration for systems over 2GB [2]). Blog posts like the one referenced are completely unfair to those that developed MongoDB - read the manual and understand how MongoDB works OR use it at your own risk. So I'll switch arguments and help you make your point. We have an application written in Oracle's Application Express - while we have extensive expertise in Oracle's database software, we have this one system which was completed for expediency's sake. It's kind of horrific but (mostly) works at the scale required. It would be financially foolish to dig into more deeply into ApEx for this one dead-end application. Everyone is happy. [1] [VIDEO] (audio NSFW) [2] [LINK]
And on that theme, then get ready for when your boss gets to the part about how NoSQL gives you: "Rapid development. If you’re developing within two-week Agile sprints, cranking out quick iterations, or needing to make frequent updates to the data structure without a lot of downtime between versions, a relational database will slow you down." Reminds me of this classic [VIDEO]
From what I've observed, the "crowd" is easily seduced by performance above all other concerns - correctness, security, science, etc. NoSQL was invented and gained popularity b/c it originally was easier to scale via sharding, and that was seductive enough [1] to give it industry momentum. While performance is a feature, it seemed many folks originally advocating NoSQL did not understand or appreciate the mathematical foundations of the relational model. A decade of experience seems to be driving zeitgeist back to scientific fundamentals. [1]: [VIDEO]
Some readers might not be familiar with that particular meme: [VIDEO] IMHO it perfectly describes the hype-reality disconnect at the early days of MongoDB. Yeah it was that bad. Mongo has improved since, the hype has toned down and the NoSQL space is more crowded these days.
The "Mongo DB is Web Scale" video just turned 10 years old. I'm pretty sure that was a big factor in MongoDB not being taken seriously by many people. [VIDEO]
The hvasilev's comment got flagged and I could not reply to it anymore, so I'll reply here (sorry) and copy-paste the hvasilev's comment verbatim below, for the sake of commenting on it's claims: --- Reality is not on the side of this language. 11 year old, has a very low adoption with virtually no jobs associated. ( [LINK] ) On the other hand if you search for "Rust" in the latest "Who wants to be hired?" thread, you will see it is quite popular with unemployed people. The reality is that the language has a lot of friction, the ergonomics are bad, the syntax is heavy and some poor decision making has been made there for a systems-level programming language. There are a lot of ideological traps in this industry and many people that fall for them. Why people are interested in ideologies and cults is beyond me. [ A screenshot: [LINK] ] --- <rant> Now my comments on the issues mentioned in the hvasilev's comment. > Reality is not on the side of this language. 11 year old, has a very low adoption with virtually no jobs associated. ( [LINK] ) Tiobe index is shit. The most flattering thing I've read about it states that it (poorly) depicts quantity of educational materials available online for particular programming language. Unfortunate naming of programming languages after letters of alphabet, symbols (++, #) and real-life stuff (like islands) doesn't help this rating either. That said, Rust isn't that popular and isn't growing much according to other better language ratings: 1.
Glad you liked it! The reference to this series of videos was intended of course. The specific video I had in mind was actually [VIDEO] Enjoy!
"Mongo DB is a web scale DB and doesn't use SQL or Joins so it's high-performance. Everybody knows that relational DBs don't scale because they use Joins and Write-To-Disk." [VIDEO]
> I understand “web scale” in the marketing term Mongo sense That's the joke. (And for anyone who hasn't seen it: [VIDEO] )
I wonder if you've ever seen this classic video mocking such marketing claims which is called "MongoDB is Web Scale": [VIDEO]
I'm not looking forward to having to argue with a coworker that thinks MongoDB is web scale because ChatGPT told them so. It will be a hell of a lot more annoying than[1] [1] [VIDEO]
Every time I hear a programmer has taken up farming I think of this moment from "MongoDB Is Web Scale": [VIDEO] Not a bad idea, actually.
I used to mispronounce Redis too and I fully fault the "MongoDB is web scale"[0] video for that. Glad I'm not alone heh [0]: [VIDEO]
About 15 years ago or so, webscale was everything and MongoDB was webscale[1][2] hence being used everywhere. Has it become a legacy product, or are there still good reasons for using it in a new project in 2025? [1]: [VIDEO] [2]: [LINK]
I think "the reality", at least as something involving a new paradigm, has yet to be established. I'll note that I heard plenty of similar talk about how developers just couldn't adapt six months or more ago. Promoters now can admit those tools were in fact pretty bad, because they now have something else to promote, but at the time those not rawdogging LLMs were dinosaurs under a big meteor. I do of course agree that some people are just refusing to "wrap their minds around the changing world". But anybody with enough experience in tech can count a lot more instances of "the world is about to change" than "the world really changed". The most recent obvious example being cryptocurrencies, but there are plenty of others. [1] So I think there's plenty of room here for legitimate skepticism. And for just waiting until things settle down to see where we ended up. [1] E.g. [VIDEO]
But with a hour long video, how do you know if the content is any good? With text I can skim around the headings and images and see at a glance how deep the author is going into the subject. In that specific video the first 30 minutes is related to everything but the new Web Scale[0] LLM native database the author is "moving to" from SQL. Meanwhile Postgresql is just chugging along and over-performing all of them. [0] [VIDEO]
> Majority of projects don't need the web scale or whatever. Truth. All the major cloud platform marketing is YAGNI but for infrastructure instead of libraries/code. As someone who works in ops and has since starting as a sysadmin in the early 00s, it's been entertaining to say the least to watch everyone rediscover hosting your own stuff as if it's some new innovation and wasn't ever possible before. It's like that old MongoDB is web scale video ( [VIDEO] ) Watching devs discover Docker was similarly entertaining back then when us in ops have been using LXC and BSD jails, etc. to containerize code pre-DevOps. Anyway, all that to say - go buy your gray beard sysadmins a coffee let them help you. We would all be thrilled to bring stuff back on-prem or go back to self hosting and running infra again and probably have a few tricks to teach you.
Who cares about stars on Github??? "If dev null is fast and webscale I will use it" "Does dev null support sharding" Who remembers [VIDEO]
I'm reminded of the "MongoDB is WebScale" video: as of this moment I officially resigned from my job as software engineer and will take up work on the farm shoveling pig shit and administering anal suppositories to sick horses because that will be a thousand times more tolerable than being in the same industry as dipshits like you [VIDEO]