Q&A with Guido van Rossum, Inventor of Python
Microsoft Reactor0 HN recommenders · 2021–2023
28K views · interview · dated · Uploaded 2021-05-14
An open Q&A with Python creator Guido van Rossum hosted by Microsoft Reactor, covering his career, PyCon's origins and his opinions on other languages.
HN uses it as a source for Guido's views on Rust, Go and Python 4, with timestamps shared.
53:22Ruby Conf 12 - Y Not- Adventures in Functional Programming by Jim Weirich
Confreaks
2:25:52The spelled-out intro to neural networks and backpropagation: building micrograd
Andrej Karpathy
49:55How Python was Shaped by leaky Internals, Armin Ronacher, Flask framework
Видео с мероприятий {speach!
38:47RailsConf 2014 - All the Little Things by Sandi Metz
Confreaks
26:53What the heck is the event loop anyway? | Philip Roberts | JSConf EU
JSConf
1:00:43Jim Simons (full length interview) - Numberphile
Numberphile2
14:34Steve Jobs Stanford Commencement Speech 2005
JoshuaG
1:00:19How To Design A Good API and Why it Matters
Google TechTalks
3 comments from Hacker News
It links to the one hour interview at YouTube - [VIDEO] . His views on Rust starts at [VIDEO] . Go at [VIDEO] . (Short) Julia at [VIDEO] After making his comments about Julia, "I"m sure in 5 minutes that will be on Hacker News with a counter-example" (of a web server in Julia "with a lot of mileage out of it). TypeScript at [VIDEO] . Of the four mentioned language, that has the most influence on Python.
Is Nim particularly similar to Python? More than Go, which Guido recently described as being the new language that’s most Pythonic? [VIDEO]
I was curious about these comments and did a small web search. I found a video interview from May 21, 2021 [1] and have pasted some excerpted quotations from it from Guido van Rossum below for others who are curious. “Python 4, at this point whenever it’s mentioned in the core development team, it is very much as a joke… We’ve learned our lesson from Python 3 vs 2, and so it’s almost taboo to talk about a Python 4 in a serious sense.” [...] “I normally talk about that as a mistake, because Python was more successful than the core developers realised and so we should have been much more aware and supportive of transitioning from Python 2 to Python 3” [...] “I’m not thrilled about the idea of Python 4 and nobody in the core dev team really is – so probably there never will be a 4.0 and we’ll just keep numbering until 3.33, at least” [...] “We now have a strict annual release schedule, so after 3.10 will be 3.11 and after that will be 3.12, and so forth. We can go up to 3.99 before we have to add another digit. Adding another digit is not completely trivial, but still much better than going from 3 to 4." [1]: [VIDEO]