The Missile Knows Where it is (Remix)
Krasniye0 HN recommenders · 2020–2025
2M views · music · evergreen · Uploaded 2017-03-12
A short hip-hop remix of the well-known 'The missile knows where it is' monologue about missile guidance logic. It is a meme-style piece taken from 4chan.
Used as a joke whenever a thread touches on missile guidance or Kalman filters.
18:09Video explains the world's most important 6-sec drum loop
Landon Proctor
19:06This Is Phil Fish
Innuendo Studios
42:29YouTube's copyright system isn't broken. The world's is.
Tom Scott
6:18Fear the Boom and Bust: Keynes vs. Hayek - The Original Economics Rap Battle!
Radical Discourse
6:59The Problem With Facebook
2veritasium
15:47VidMe or Why Platforms Aren't Your Friends
Folding Ideas
2:31:44This is Financial Advice
Folding Ideas
9:36Why Are You So Angry? Part 1: A Short History of Anita Sarkeesian
Innuendo Studios
3 comments from Hacker News
>The crowning touch, however, was wiring the seeker to aim not where the target was, but where it would be. The missile knows where it is, [VIDEO] , a great song about missile guidance systems and knowing where you are by how much you aren't (there).
predicting trajectory of a projectile is what computers were first made to do, at least if you count ENIAC as the first, and the Apollo Guidance Computer not long after (the missile knows where it is at all times, it knows this because it knows where it isn't... [0]) as it happens the projectiles have minds of their own now so to predict trajectory will require theory-of-mind shooting down fast moving drones might just be the path to self-awareness in the machine world, "if I were a drone, what action would I take in that situation..." [0] [LINK] [0.b remix] [VIDEO]
I'm curious about how you'd do that, too. I haven't tried doing anything like that, but I'd think you'd start by trying to formalize the usual optimality proof for the Kalman filter, transfer it to actual program logic on the assumption that the program manipulates real numbers, try to get the proof to work on floating-point numbers, and finally extract the program from the proof to run it. [VIDEO] has a different attempt to formalize Kalman filters which I think we can all agree was not a successful formalization.