Science is a liar...Sometimes, Its Always Sunny in Philadelphia
parispaok0 HN recommenders · 2015–2021
3.4M views · comedy · evergreen · Uploaded 2013-04-22
A clip from It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia season 8 in which a character argues that science is a liar and cannot be trusted.
HN mostly uses it jokingly as a reference for anti-science or trust-your-own-research arguments rather than recommending it.
36:47Harder Drive: Hard drives we didn't want or need
suckerpinch
9:04Jackie Chan - How to Do Action Comedy
Every Frame a Painting
5:09George Carlin Talks About "Stuff"
CappyNJ
41:44Captain Disillusion: World's Greatest Blenderer - Live at the Blender Conference 2018
Captain Disillusion
2:24Threads (1984) ORIGINAL TRAILER [HD 1080p]
HD Retro Trailers
15:42Where in the world is it easiest to get rich? | Harald Eia | TEDxOslo
TEDx Talks
9:49Margin Call (2011) - Senior Partners Emergency Meeting [HD 1080p] (Re-Upload / Audio Fixed)
Extractor
4:45Patrick Stewart interview - Parkinson - BBC
BBC Studios
5 comments from Hacker News
Interestingly the first sentence of your second paragraph is a plot point in an episode of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia ("Science is a liar ... sometimes") : [VIDEO]
"Our understanding of physics is very wrong" - this seems very likely to me. Pretty much all scientists have been proven wrong so far in significant ways. The entire structure of the universe makes no sense without tons of dark matter and dark energy we can't observe, which sounds a lot like the way we used to balance the equations of orbits so the earth was the center of the galaxy. [VIDEO] 2. I think this alleges a pretty large conspiracy theory on the order of 9/11 being faked. There is a wide body of evidence from a lot of reputable witnesses of unexplained phenomena. The idea that the military fabricated that video and the pilots who are the witnesses is more ridiculous to me than "Our understanding of physics is very wrong"
I've just read one ( [LINK] ) and it was less than convincing. In fact, I feel like it's a less-crude version of Mac's argument ( [VIDEO] ).
He was an ethics professor. I bet a good amount of money that the point he was making pertained to blindly trusting authority rather than doing your own research. Or in other words: [VIDEO]
Indeed there would. The naive estimate of deaths is bad enough, the knock on impact is a bit harder to wrap our heads around in terms of magnitude, but would still be severe. Basically - this is not nothing, it’s being treated like a Big Deal because it legitimately is. There’s a lot of talk from the “treatment is worse than the disease” crowd, scant few of whom are experts. And like climate change and evolution deniers many of the arguments seem to boil down to conspiracy theories or the It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia argument - “science is a liar ... sometimes”: [VIDEO]