Apple II Forever
Alfred DiBlasi0 HN recommenders · 2026–2026
213K views · other · evergreen · Uploaded 2007-01-27
A short clip from the April 1984 Apple IIc rollout presentation at the Moscone Center, uploaded by Alfred DiBlasi. It argues the Apple II line funded the Macintosh's early years.
HN cites it as period footage showing how Apple presented the II line and how the company leaned on its education market to survive.
28:03AT&T Archives: Similiarities of Wave Behavior (Bonus Edition)
AT&T Tech Channel
1:24:13Micro Men - 720p (2009)
gimpymoo
1:21:22Light Years Ahead | The 1969 Apollo Guidance Computer
TNMoC
3:36elevated by Rgba & TBC | 4k intro (FullHD 1080p demoscene demo)
Demoscene High-Quality Videos (Annikras)
41:53Mechanical Computer (All Parts) - Basic Mechanisms In Fire Control Computers
Excelsior10000
56:09Project Code Rush - The Beginnings of Netscape / Mozilla Documentary
The Documentary Network
32:56Bret Victor The Future of Programming
Joey Reid
54:11Ed Catmull, Pixar: Keep Your Crises Small
Stanford Graduate School of Business
3 comments from Hacker News
There's also "Apple ][ Forever" [VIDEO] These videos have a certain look, and it comes from how they were originally presented to the audience with a massive bank of computer-controlled slide projectors that could cross-fade between images.
> "the Macintosh itself was not a commercial success" which is another strange claim Macintosh was in fact not successful for many years, and Apple survived by chanting "Apple II Forever!" at their legacy edu market. [VIDEO] Also the fail Apple III was Jobs' machine. Scully and Gasse made the Macintosh II line successful by marketing expensive workstations to creative professionals. That was against Jobs' "vision" so of course he discounts it. One thing which has never changed: Apple won't lift their finger unless they get a 30% margin.
They did music videos for a few of these too: Blue Busters: [LINK] Apple II Forever: [VIDEO] Leading the Way: [LINK] I guess stuff like this is what happens when your marketing department has too little to do.