Blockchain vs. Bullshit: Thoughts on the Future of Money [Classic Bitcoin & Open Blockchain Talk]
aantonop3 HN recommenders · 2017–2017
383K views · talk · dated · Uploaded 2017-04-22
Andreas Antonopoulos explains how to tell Bitcoin-style blockchains from corporate blockchain hype. He argues the goal should be de-banking everyone rather than banking the unbanked.
HN commenters recommend it as a corrective to enterprise blockchain marketing and as an explanation of what makes Bitcoin distinctive.
51:32Behind the Scenes of iOS Security
Black Hat
12:01Why Electronic Voting Is Still A Bad Idea
Tom Scott
25:16But how does bitcoin actually work?
3Blue1Brown
12:44We Were Taught to Call Death a Blessing
CGP Grey
1:02:42Preventing the Collapse of Civilization / Jonathan Blow (Thekla, Inc)
DevGAMM
8:38Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange
Art of the Problem
48:02BlackHat USA 2011: SSL And The Future Of Authenticity
Christiaan008
1:04:41Jonathan Blow - Preventing the Collapse of Civilization (English only)
bus
3 comments from Hacker News
How pointless. The whole point of Bitcoin was to have uncensorable, decentralized asset that can be used to exchange value without any trust etc. That is the only reason we endure this utterly shitty and inefficient blockchain thing, and we exchange money for this otherwise pointless online points. I have no problem with ETH as cryptocurrency / smart contract platform. But this whole Enterprise Ethereum Alliance is just one big BS. Etherum community is trying to pump ETH value by associating with brand names, and corporations are trying to pump their stock value by presenting themselves as innovative. BS - empty words and marketing gimmicks. Just read through that page. Just watch Blockchain vs. Bullshit: [VIDEO]
This sound like just another case of misunderstanding the core technology. I can recommend watching: [VIDEO]
Andreas Antonopoulous has a great talk on this: [VIDEO] Spoiler: nothing, “blockchain” is one piece of what makes Bitcoin interesting.