LSTM is dead. Long Live Transformers!
Seattle Applied Deep Learning4 HN recommenders · 2020–2023
540K views · lecture · evergreen · Uploaded 2019-12-03
Leo Dirac explains how transformer models have replaced LSTMs in NLP. He gives background from bag of words through RNNs and LSTMs, then a technical deep dive into multi-headed self-attention and positional encoding, with sample code.
Recommended as a clear explanation of why RNNs fall short and how transformers solve it.
2:25:52The spelled-out intro to neural networks and backpropagation: building micrograd
Andrej Karpathy
18:40But what is a neural network? | Deep learning chapter 1
3Blue1Brown
1:30:28AlphaGo - The Movie | Full award-winning documentary
Google DeepMind
27:14Transformers, the tech behind LLMs | Deep Learning Chapter 5
3Blue1Brown
51:22USENIX Security '18-Q: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible?
USENIX
1:08:40Lecture 1 | Machine Learning (Stanford)
Stanford
5:58MarI/O - Machine Learning for Video Games
SethBling
3:31:24Deep Dive into LLMs like ChatGPT
Andrej Karpathy
5 comments from Hacker News
I've just recently been on a journey to understand transformers in and out, here are the resources I've found managed to drill it into my head: 1. Chapters 7, 9, 10 [LINK] This was really useful to really build up to the concepts of attention (although the actual attention section is still brief). 2. [LINK] This was great for visualization and understanding that attention wasn't exclusively for transformers and actually was for RNNs first. 3. [LINK] Getting to understand how transformers actually work visually. 4. [VIDEO] This lecture by Leo Dirac was extremely helpful to finish off with, not only because it actually includes some pseudocode but it also revisits some key topics and covers why transformers are needed. One of the big confusion points for me was that the concept of ATTENTION and SELF-ATTENTION are not the same thing. Hope this helps.
Yannic Kilcher is great but this video worked better for me: "LSTM is dead. Long live transformers!" (Leo Dirac): [VIDEO]
The attention mechanism started as a simple trick to not use recurrent neural networks. Read the intro in the original paper "Attention is all you need paper" ( [LINK] ) This video explains the drawbacks to RNNs and how transformers solve that: [VIDEO] Andrej Karpathy explains attention here: [LINK] He explains how attention is seen as a communication network: [LINK]
I'm not sure I understand it well enough to say but watching a video on it [0] I think there were a few key points: * "Attention is all you need" introduced positional encoding which allows you to keep context of the word, allowing for more complex translation (and thus generative/chatgpt like tasks?) because words now have context relative to each other. Contrast this with "bag of words" models that only tells you whether the word is present or not. * I don't quite understand why but transformers (which "AiaYN" introduced) can be made fully parallel, compared with the RNN/LSTM networks which has to be serial per token. Fully parallel allows for GPU optimization, which means you can take advantage of Moore's law for training. I'm always a bit suspicious when people claim a breakthrough of this sort. There's no doubt that better algorithms give better results but how much is due to just faster computers, cheaper compute, memory, etc. [0] [VIDEO]
I don't think you really want a 5yo's version, because that's "computers can be smart". But for an SDE1-level explanation I made this video which has gotten tons of compliments and keeps people watching year after year: [VIDEO] It's in the context of NLP, which is where transformers started of course.