Doug McLean | Common Misconceptions in Aerodynamics
Michigan Engineering4 HN recommenders · 2019–2021
856K views · talk · evergreen · Uploaded 2013-10-21
Retired Boeing Technical Fellow Doug McLean walks through common misconceptions in aerodynamics, drawing on his book Understanding Aerodynamics. He critiques popular explanations of wing lift and rocket thrust and argues for arguing from the real physics.
HN commenters point to it as a credible debunking of the popular but wrong explanations of how wings generate lift.
28:03AT&T Archives: Similiarities of Wave Behavior (Bonus Edition)
AT&T Tech Channel
35:15Heat Pumps: the Future of Home Heating
Technology Connections
25:33Children Of The Magenta Line
Mossie Fly
4:43Richard Feynman Fire
nebulajr
22:49I bought 1000 meters of wire to settle a physics debate
AlphaPhoenix
19:45Building a realistic artificial sun (for dark winter days)
DIY Perks
12:46The Speed of Light is NOT About Light
PBS Space Time
21:15Brown; color is weird
Technology Connections
4 comments from Hacker News
As an aside, when you're reading the article and you stumble across the link to a description of how lift works, do yourself a favor and skip it. Instead, check out [VIDEO] . Almost no matter how sophisticated or simple your theory of lift is, it's almost certainly significantly at odds with observed physical phenomenon.
Doug McLean (Boeing Technical Fellow) has a quite decent talk about the question of intuitive explanations for aerodynamic lift: [VIDEO] Also Philippe Spalart's quote is right on the money: "It's easy to explain how a rocket works, but explaining how a wing works takes a rocket scientist".
Yeah, the usual explanation of "air goes faster over the top because they have to meet at the end" is BS. Especially the 2nd part. A video about the subject [VIDEO] But the explanation I can come up with is: lift is a force due to low-pressure regions caused by laminar flow over a surface. It is essentially "form drag" (caused not by the profile facing air directly but by the aft part) but the tricky part is that it is not directly parallel to the flow of air, but also depends on the orientation of the wing.
You might get something out of this 2013 talk by former Boeing engineer Doug McLean on misconceptions about lift. [0] [0] [VIDEO] (watch for 5 minutes to get some idea of his main points, or 35 minutes to watch in full. The link will skip the introduction.)