HackerTube

Why renewables can’t save the planet | Michael Shellenberger | TEDxDanubia

TEDx Talks3 HN recommenders · 2019–2020
5.7M views · talk · dated · Uploaded 2019-01-04

Michael Shellenberger argues in a TEDx talk that solar and wind need huge amounts of land and mining, and says nuclear power is a better path to protecting both the climate and nature.

HN commenters credit it with changing their minds on nuclear power and cite it for the downsides of renewables.

Nuclear power & fusionRenewables, batteries & storageClimate policy, solutions & debate

Watch on YouTube

5 comments from Hacker News

@nestorD2019 · in “The Third Phase of Clean Energy Will Be Most Disruptive Yet”

Watching the following TED talk, I was surprised to discover that gas compagny such as Total are actually promoting renewable energies because they currently need to be complemented and gas is the main solution used for that purpose. [VIDEO]

CitesView on HN
@mikemotherwell2019 · in “In Australia, Coal Remains King”

> Australia, with it's plentiful sunshine and wide open spaces It's funny, but that sounds an AWFUL lot like the Terra Nullius argument used to disposes Indigenous people of their land. Australia's "wide open spaces" are home to flora and fauna that are unique and worth preserving. The idea we'd want vast swaths of solar destroying the natural environment - one that is unique and wonderful - is odd to me. [VIDEO] really changed my mind on this. I was pro-nuclear before seeing it, but am even more so after.

Strongly recommendsView on HN
@0xfaded2019 · in “Cascade reactions use nanoparticles to convert CO2 to complex molecules”

I recently watched a TED talk which changed my opinion of renewables from "maybe" to "no". Basically he argues that solar and wind are low density energy sources that require significant resources to capture, which all become waste after 25 years. Meanwhile we have nuclear which provides consistent base load, and for very good reasons we have gotten good at containing all the waste/pollution produced. I'm now of the opinion we should be on a sprint towards fusion, investing heavily in other nuclear technologies, e.g. thorium, along the way. Sorry to leave a video link, but it's what changed my mind and therefore in my opinion the best delivery of the argument I'm aware of. [VIDEO]

Strongly recommendsView on HN
@kinjba12020 · in “Air pollution is worse than we thought”

No energy source [that we've discovered so far] is perfect. All have downsides. Sadly, living in denial of that fact is more popular than ever, but that's a separate topic. Here are a couple TED talks showing the downside of renewable energy - such as the enormous land usage and reliable energy storage needed to compete with nuclear or fossil. Why renewables can’t save the planet [VIDEO] A reality check on renewables [LINK]

RecommendsView on HN
@corn13read2020 · in “We Need a Nuclear New Deal, Not a Green New Deal”

Liquid Salt and Thorium are the best wins we have today until we figure out fusion. [VIDEO] Simple facts.

CitesView on HN