The Last Human – A Glimpse Into The Far Future
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell1 HN recommenders · 2022–2023
15.2M views · explainer · evergreen · Uploaded 2022-06-28
A Kurzgesagt animation on longtermism, arguing that because the future could hold trillions of people, our actions' effect on future generations may be what matters most.
HN uses it as a reference for the scale of future human population and long-term thinking.
2:00:00Dominion (2018) - full documentary [Official]
Farm Transparency Project
54:56Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 01 "THE MORAL SIDE OF MURDER"
Harvard University
15:01What Happened to Horses Is Happening to Us
CGP Grey
12:44We Were Taught to Call Death a Blessing
CGP Grey
1:02:42Preventing the Collapse of Civilization / Jonathan Blow (Thekla, Inc)
DevGAMM
2:23:07Alain de Botton: Status Anxiety
Alain de Botton
2:23Music and Life - Alan Watts
seandulac
8:06The Egg - A Short Story
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
4 comments from Hacker News
Take a look at the recent Kurzgesagt video: [VIDEO] If humanity plays its cards right, there will be trillions and trillions of humans living in the future, all over the galaxy. Everyone who lives right now, or has ever lived, is barely noticeable compared to that. Take a look at the recent Less Wrong post: [LINK] I don't see any flaws in this argument, we all are on a fast-track to getting killed by AI, and the smartest people on the planet don't have a plan on how to fix it. "Build an AI that burns all GPUs to prevent all the future AIs, and hopefully doesn't kill us all in the process" is the best idea they've got. If you believe that we're about to kill trillions and trillions of potential future human beings, these priorities make sense.
After seeing The last human - Kurzgesagt [VIDEO] and realizing that for all Of human history we have though it was the end - and actually it’s more likely that as the first few billion humans we will be the source of fascination for many generations to come. Our digital record will be preserved and relentlessly studied. Maybe our thread here will be a footnote in a hologram in a few millennia.
It's survivorship bias—where bias means skewed from the full distribution of choices people and societies made, not bias as in discrimination. Most of the families and societies that didn't prioritize population growth (by reproduction or immigration) aren't around to advocate for that approach's merits, whereas those that did are. Fun fact: for each human alive today there've been 15 deceased humans ever. As zombie apocalypses go, 15:1 doesn't sound too bad. Kurzgesagt has some interesting videos on human population if that's your style: [VIDEO] [LINK]
A line in a Kurzgesagt video ( [VIDEO] ) a while back caught my attention. “Every generation assumes they’re important enough to witness the apocalypse.” I don’t think that’s the only factor in people wishing for collapse, but I think it’s one of them.