2017/05/17: Senate hearing on Bill C16
Jordan B Peterson0 HN recommenders · 2017–2020
2.3M views · other · news · Uploaded 2017-05-18
Jordan Peterson's testimony at the Canadian Senate hearing on Bill C16, which added gender identity and expression to protected grounds. He argues against compelled speech.
Referenced as the hearing that propelled Peterson to public visibility and as a source on the compelled speech debate.
46:39Don't Talk to the Police
Regent University School of Law
42:29YouTube's copyright system isn't broken. The world's is.
Tom Scott
57:19Republic, Lost | Lawrence Lessig | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
21:08Christopher Hitchens - Free Speech
hitch archive
7:22Antonin Scalia - On American Exceptionalism
AmericanRhetoric.com
1:02:38The Cardboard Box Reform - Nixon's Ghost Bill & A Crucial Flaw in Democracy
CRI
18:20We the People, and the Republic we must reclaim | Lawrence Lessig
TED
1:00:36Seattle is Dying | A KOMO News Documentary
KOMO News
3 comments from Hacker News
> despite numerous respectable legal scholars informing him that you could never get in trouble for not using a person's preferred pronoun because of this bill. [VIDEO] As mentioned, his employer's lawyers did think so. The Adversarial Model (legal system) doesn't consider that some parties come to other conclusions. It would be ill-advised to listen to "experts" that are not part of a case, taking the advice of pundits* or other unconnected parties is not compelling evidence of legal finding. *It's primarily in the US, that the mass media promotes education pundits as corroboration in legal matters.
This was precisely the argument in the Canadian Senate, 2 years ago, that propelled Jordan Peterson to public visibility. [VIDEO]
I'm not sure if the compelled speech was actually adopted into law. I'm referring to Jordan Peterson's interview and senate hearing in relation to the law. [1] [LINK] [2] [VIDEO]