Space Suit Testing
NaOHKDBO0 HN recommenders · 2015–2019
786K views · news · evergreen · Uploaded 2010-06-02
Short footage from a NASA space suit test in which a technician is exposed to near-vacuum after an accidental depressurization. It shows the instantaneous effects on a human body.
Cited as real footage of someone surviving brief vacuum exposure.
28:03AT&T Archives: Similiarities of Wave Behavior (Bonus Edition)
AT&T Tech Channel
35:15Heat Pumps: the Future of Home Heating
Technology Connections
1:21:22Light Years Ahead | The 1969 Apollo Guidance Computer
TNMoC
23:32The Solar Gravitational Lens will Map Exoplanets. Seriously.
Launch Pad Astronomy
4:43Richard Feynman Fire
nebulajr
19:45Building a realistic artificial sun (for dark winter days)
DIY Perks
1:01:4234C3 - The Ultimate Apollo Guidance Computer Talk
media.ccc.de
34:19Falcon Heavy Test Flight
SpaceX
3 comments from Hacker News
There was a notable incident in the 1960s where a NASA spacesuit technician named Jim LeBlanc survived an accidental (but brief) depressurization. There's a YouTube video describing the accident which includes film of the accident itself: [VIDEO] .
I think this is the actual study: [LINK] I fundamentally dissagree that it was trivial, but I worked on large vacuum systems and feel a bit close to the topic. But I also fundamentally agree that the experimentation was barbaric and cruel. But... I also don't see how we could have worked around it. I hope it's some consolation that they never doubly-exposed the dogs; I'm actually surprised that wasn't attempted. Unshielded hard vacuum is horrific. The problem isn't that it's awful - that's obvious - but exactly how does it affect the body? (I've sealed a hole with my hand and got a hickey, but I've never been immersed in it.) Even today, studying things in a vacuum is difficult; it's always behind a think layer of material that's hard to observe through, and even with cleverness you're testing through the neck of a bottle or only looking back on data logged by some gizmo. And there are a lot of confounding variables; narrowing the time-to-unconciousness/death was the most critical, and each test batch needed multiple samples to make sure no data was wasted. One note that came out was that it seems clearly better to recompress with pure oxygen; would that fire hazard be worth the risk in space (especially after Apollo 1), or would they need to design a mechanism to temporarily mange it? I could see that argument having a significant impact on the cabin design. But yeah. We can do better. A damn sight better. We can illuminate and record and monitor so much better. A couple yea
NASA once accidentally depressurized a man while testing space suits in a vacuum chamber. He lost consciousness in less than 15 seconds, but fully recovered after depressurization. He reported feeling his saliva boil which is... exciting. [VIDEO] [LINK] During Project Excelsior, Joseph Kittinger's right hand was depressurized at 100,000 feet and swelled up, but he was ultimately unharmed. [LINK]