Black Hat 2013 - Exploiting Network Surveillance Cameras Like a Hollywood Hacker
HackersOnBoard1 HN recommenders · 2016–2021
1.1M views · talk · dated · Uploaded 2013-11-20
Craig Heffner's Black Hat 2013 talk on exploiting network surveillance cameras, covering how insecure their firmware is. It shows how easily such devices can be compromised.
HN cites it as a fun and damning illustration of how poor security is in IP cameras, even expensive ones.
6:538-bit computer update
Ben Eater
22:21Reverse emulating the NES to give it SUPER POWERS!
suckerpinch
27:25“Hello, world” from scratch on a 6502 — Part 1
Ben Eater
51:32Behind the Scenes of iOS Security
Black Hat
12:01Why Electronic Voting Is Still A Bad Idea
Tom Scott
51:22USENIX Security '18-Q: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible?
USENIX
42:50Defcon 18 Changing threats to privacy Moxie Marlinspike Part
killab66661
1:07:51Shenzhen: The Silicon Valley of Hardware (Full Documentary) | Future Cities | WIRED
WIRED Investigations
5 comments from Hacker News
Here's a pretty fun 2 year old talk from Blackhat, re surveillance camera firmware and how s*tty they are: [VIDEO]
Ah, security cameras. Never-updated linux boxes, frequently with homegrown http servers, often with secret hardcoded credentials in clear text laying around in the firmware blob. [VIDEO]
Most of the out-of-band management systems (aka IPMI/DRAC/LOM) that server vendors use are built by the same 2-3 companies and rebranded. These companies churn out some truly horrible software with little consideration for security. It's often difficult to automate firmware updates, so they tend to stay vulnerable. It's a similar situation to webcams: [VIDEO]
These vague "The Chinese are up to something but we cannot reveal what" isn't really helpful, particularly given the current trade tensions This is exacerbated by the very poor levels of security in these devices in general: DEF CON 23 - Robinson and Mitchell - Knocking my neighbors kids cruddy drone offline [LINK] However, to put things into perspective, purpose built security cameras -- even expensive ones from well reputed industry brands -- have had similar very poor levels of very poor security for many years. [VIDEO] It's not really a problem of drones. It's a problem with the poor levels of security in consumer devices in general. It's "as if" the situation has been engineered to let bad actors do lots of spying.
>The thing I’d add is that it’s not just consumer-grade products with this problem, there are plenty of supposedly professional-grade devices where the firmware is junk too. Absolutely. An example: [VIDEO] There are $5000 security cameras placed in very sensitive areas with security just as poor as the $50 trash you can buy from Office Depot (or at least it was the case 8 years ago).