Back to the Future | VFXcool (1/2)
Captain Disillusion2 HN recommenders · 2018–2024
2.2M views · explainer · evergreen · Uploaded 2017-08-31
Captain Disillusion explains the visual effects behind the Back to the Future trilogy. He covers ILM's motion-control, computer-controlled camera work and clever pre-CGI tricks.
Recommended as a succinct documentary on motion control and practical-effects ingenuity.
24:26The Beauty of Bézier Curves
Freya Holmér
54:11Ed Catmull, Pixar: Keep Your Crises Small
Stanford Graduate School of Business
1:46:51"Money doesn't interest me" - Ton Roosendaal 2017 Interview
Blender Guru
9:04Jackie Chan - How to Do Action Comedy
Every Frame a Painting
7:20DNA animation (2002-2014) by Drew Berry and Etsuko Uno wehi.tv #ScienceArt
WEHImovies
37:31Everything is a Remix (Original Series)
Kirby Ferguson
16:30"NO CGI" is really just INVISIBLE CGI - 1
The Movie Rabbit Hole
13:35The Marvel Symphonic Universe
Every Frame a Painting
5 comments from Hacker News
There was an electro-mechanical landing simulator for the Space Shuttle, which "flew" a video camera over a miniature landscape. Unfortunately, it's very hard to search for, because of all of the Space Shuttle simulator products. EDIT: The lack of references to those electro-mechanical video landing simulators is pretty dramatic. They came at the brief period of time when computers were powerful enough to enable very sophisticated motion control, but too weak for real time 3D simulation. For a brief period of time, they were rare and valuable equipment, then quickly became obsolete junk. There are simply no references to them which show that mechanism! For an example of that period's motion control as used in VFX: [VIDEO] Can anyone help find a reference?
Computers were also used to control the physical camera. Captain Disallusionment does a video on Back to the Future special effects when he talks about how this was the era before CGI but that used computer controlled cameras to achieve certain special effects. [VIDEO]
One solution to this would be to put the camera on a fixture that replays the same motions every time, so they can do a 'dry run' and correct the rendering. (Putting a camera on a fixture is not new, IIRC they did it in Back to the Future - [VIDEO] is a really good yet succinct documentary on it)
We gave it up for slightly higher profit margins enabled by hiring slightly less qualified programmers at a slightly lower rate. In a similar vein, Industrial Light and Magic used to have a few highly talented people crafting incredibly intelligent solutions to make their movies possible: [VIDEO] By now, most of those effects would instead be done using CGI and outsourced to Asia.
And if you're an HN reader and already know and love Back to the Future, then the Captain Disillusion's 2 part YouTube video about how the visual effects used ground breaking computer control of cameras to advance the state of the art is a good recommendation: [VIDEO]