Can we build AI without losing control over it? | Sam Harris
TED1 HN recommenders · 2017–2023
3.9M views · talk · dated · Uploaded 2016-10-19
Sam Harris argues in a TED talk that we will build superhuman AI and have not grappled with the risk of creating something that may treat us the way we treat ants. He makes a logical case for taking AI risk seriously.
HN cites it in AI risk debates, sometimes as an argument that has aged well and sometimes as an example of alarmist framing.
15:01What Happened to Horses Is Happening to Us
CGP Grey
10:36Why Would AI Want to do Bad Things? Instrumental Convergence
Robert Miles AI Safety
1:15:11Veritasium: What Everyone Gets Wrong About AI and Learning – Derek Muller Explains
Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
13:03Intelligence and Stupidity: The Orthogonality Thesis
Robert Miles AI Safety
22:56We're building a dystopia just to make people click on ads | Zeynep Tufekci
TED
18:05Intro to AI Safety, Remastered
Robert Miles AI Safety
48:32Sparks of AGI: early experiments with GPT-4
Sebastien Bubeck
15:27Why Not Just: Think of AGI Like a Corporation?
Robert Miles AI Safety
3 comments from Hacker News
Even people giving TED talks about the threat of AI are unable to marshal an appropriate emotional response to the dangers that lie ahead: [VIDEO]
This made me think about Sam Harris's comparison between ourselves and John Van Neumann as analogous to a comparison between a chicken and ourselves. [1] [VIDEO]
I don't think many people are worried that what we have now is a major risk. The major concern is the implications of the trajectory we are now on. If you look at what ChatGPT and Midjourney and the like can do now compared to just a couple of years ago, it's pretty incredible. If you extrapolate the next few similar jumps in capability, and assume that won't be 20 years away, then what AI is going to be capable of before even my kids leave college is going to be mind-boggling, and in some possible futures not in a good way. I remember seeing this talk from Sam Harris nearly 6 years ago and it logically making a lot of sense back then ( [VIDEO] ). The past couple of years have made this all the more prescient. (Worth a watch if you have 15 mins).