Modular Micro-Reactors – The Future of Nuclear Energy?
Illinois EnergyProf3 HN recommenders · 2020–2021
169K views · lecture · dated · Uploaded 2020-08-26
Professor Ruzic explains modular micro-reactors: self-contained nuclear units with passive safety whose fuel lasts about 20 years. He covers their use for process and district heat and where they can compete with diesel generation.
Recommended as a clear technical explanation of micro-reactor fuel, safety and economics, from a channel HN trusts on nuclear topics.
1:11:40MIT's Pathway to Fusion Energy (IAP 2017) - Zach Hartwig
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
1:38:49Breakthrough in Nuclear Fusion? - Prof. Dennis Whyte
MIT Club of Northern California
12:50How close is nuclear fusion power?
Sabine Hossenfelder
36:12Energy Investments Dialogue | Bill Gates | Global Energy Forum
Stanford ENERGY
37:07Who Destroyed Three Mile Island? - Nickolas Means | The Lead Developer Austin 2018
LeadDev
9:13Worst Nuclear Accidents in History
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
23:10Economics of Nuclear Reactor
Illinois EnergyProf
20:29Why I changed my mind about nuclear power | Michael Shellenberger | TEDxBerlin
TEDx Talks
6 comments from Hacker News
From the press release [LINK] "NuScale spent over $500 million, with the backing of Fluor, and over 2 million labor hours to develop the information needed to prepare its DCA application" Not cheap :) On scaling down reactors to micro size (nuscale is kind of larger) and costs: [VIDEO] $0.25/kWh until large series (17mn30s).
If you have 20 minutes, the video linked in the comments of the earlier HN post is quite informative, giving a much better technical explanation than the original article: [VIDEO] It is fascinating, for example, how a slight change in the packaging of the fuel (as sand-sized pellets coated with carbon) affects the safety/stability of the design, and how resonances in the cross section for neutron absorption come into play (they broaden at higher temperatures, dampening rather than enhancing the overall reaction speed, as temperatures rise).
Illinois EnergyProf recently did a video on USNC's design: [VIDEO] (Though I think he used audio from the wrong microphone; the earlier videos sound much better.)
Think of smaller nuclear reactors as an option for places where renewables might not make sense, like in mining. Building power generation that costs 10x some renewable source will never make sense. However, building small scale nuclear as replacement for onsite diesel generators could make a whole lot of sense. Illinois Energy Prof has a good video on this => [VIDEO]
You should watch this video (and several others) of this professor, David Ruzic from Uni of Illinois This video he talks about the economics of nuclear plant. [LINK] This video, he talks about modular micro-nuclear reactor [VIDEO] His videos are great. Worth your time.
All of these systems are going to require radical construction of hundreds and hundreds of nuclear reactors. This has economics of scale benefits, and I expect reactors such as the ones discussed in this video: [VIDEO] to be produced on a factory line extremely quickly.