All the Numbers - Numberphile

Numberphile6 HN recommenders · 2019–2025
1.8M views · explainer · evergreen · Uploaded 2019-03-04

Matt Parker talks Numberphile through the different kinds of numbers: algebraic, transcendental, computable, normal, and beyond. It shows how few numbers we can actually name or describe.

HN recommends it as an accessible explanation of number categories and why almost all numbers are unknowable.

Watch on YouTube

12 comments from Hacker News

@StrangeDoctor2019 · in “Calculating a record-breaking 31.4T digits of Pi with GCP”

That's actually most numbers, but we don't know any yet. [VIDEO] numberphile (math YouTube series) describing some related concepts here.

RecommendsView on HN
@mjlee2019 · in “Famous Transcendental Numbers”

It feels like every time there's a mathematics post on the front page I post a video by Matt Parker. This time, here's a video that explains from the basics what kinds of numbers exist: [VIDEO]

RecommendsView on HN
@jerf2019 · in “Calculus Is Deeply Irrational”

It's worse than you make it sound, though: [VIDEO] In short, it isn't just that we have more computables than non-computables; there are categories of numbers like "normal" that nominally contain "all the numbers" but we can barely even name a handful.

@ccvannorman2019 · in “Is e Normal?”

It's fascinating how little we know about everyday numbers like pi and e, it's widely assumed that they are normal but there is no proof for this (and it's extremely difficult to do so). In fact we believe the fast majority of numbers are transcendental and normal but we only actually know of a single normal number, and it is a manufactured number. Numberphile has an excellent video on the numbers we know about and the quest to find / define normal numbers: [VIDEO]

Strongly recommendsView on HN
@KboPAacDA32020 · in “Chaitin's Constant”

Numberphile has a video explaining the relationship between the number categories, and includes a brief discussion of where Chaitin's Constant belongs. [VIDEO]

RecommendsView on HN
@deepspace2020 · in “How real are real numbers? (2004)”

I found Matt Parker's video to be a good way to visualize the fact that we 'know' essentailly 0% of numbers: [VIDEO]

RecommendsView on HN
@Beldin2023 · in “An intutive counterexample to the axiom of choice”

See also this Numberphile video on numbers, including algebraic, computable, transcendental, and talking about numbers beyond those. [VIDEO]

@Arnavion2024 · in “Memorizing the first 100 perfect squares (2022)”

Such numbers are called "normal numbers". Pi likely is one based on all the digits we've computed for it, but we don't have any way to prove a given number like pi is normal or not. Relevant Numberphile video: [VIDEO]

@gcanyon2025 · in “The number line freaks me out (2016)”

This video parallels the article, going further. I love the tag line, "We know none of the numbers." [VIDEO]

RecommendsView on HN
@globular-toast2025 · in “The number line freaks me out (2016)”

I wonder if this was the inspiration for this numberphile video? [VIDEO] The video does go further than the article.

@ccvannorman2025 · in “What can be computed? A practical guide to the theory of computation (2018) [pdf]”

corollary: Numberphile (with Matt Parker of Stand Up Maths) - "All the Numbers". Most are incomputable, of course :) [0] [VIDEO]

@gcanyon2025 · in “The Unknotting Number Is Not Additive”

You might appreciate this video where Matt Parker lays out the various classes of numbers and concludes by describing the normal numbers as being the overwhelmingly vast proportion of numbers and laments "we mathematicians think we know what's what, but so far we have found none of the numbers." [VIDEO]

RecommendsView on HN