Introducing SILE: A New Typesetting System
lathosjp2 HN recommenders · 2016–2022
5K views · talk · dated · Uploaded 2015-03-21
The SILE author's FOSDEM 2015 talk introducing SILE, a TeX-inspired typesetting system with frame-based layout, Unicode, OpenType and a Lua-based extensible design.
Pointed to as the standard introduction to SILE as a modern TeX alternative, though possibly dated.
10:13The Problem with Time & Timezones - Computerphile
Computerphile
21:15Brown; color is weird
Technology Connections
6:34Stephen Fry Kinetic Typography - Language
Built By Matt
48:00Monktoberfest 2016: Bryan Cantrill - Oral Tradition in Software Engineering
RedMonk Tech Events
28:46FarewellEtaoinShrdlu
Drinks and Dice
54:01You Suck at Excel - Joel Spolsky (Reupload)
Cool Bug Facts
19:40How I Designed a Free Music Font for 5 Million Musicians (MuseScore 3.6)
Tantacrul
15:09Mouse Cursor History (and why I made my own)
Posy
5 comments from Hacker News
Of recent attempts at dethroning LaTeX, there's also SILE, which actually reuses some LaTeX internals. For some examples of the output (hard to find, the author seems not great at marketing), see e.g.: [LINK] [LINK] [LINK] [LINK] [LINK] [LINK] For a deeper dive, see the author's presentation at FOSDEM 2015 - I found it really amusing - from the starting line of: "I wrote a typesetting system - by mistake." [VIDEO]
Yes, it made me recall this, though I first saw it in FOSDEM '15 talks [1]. I thought it'd be nice to see what people think about this as I'm in the looks for a TeX alternative. [1] [VIDEO]
Recently I have been also thinking about TeX's internals, also because I feel the pain points you describe in at [LINK] . I have too thought about experimenting with TeX rewrites/alternatives and particularly in Rust. I don't know if you are aware, but finl has been also submitted to Lobsters ( [LINK] ). One of the comments mentions SILE ( [LINK] ). I looked into it ( [VIDEO] was nice introduction, although I don't know how up to date it is). It seems to me that SILE replaces many pain points in TeX, while being somewhat close to LuaTeX (and TeX in general), due to use of similiar components (Lua, alogorithms, hyphenation patters, libraries). It even supports "LaTeX" like input syntax, but frankly I don't think that is the part of LaTeX I would keep :). Can you share your opinion on SILE?
> Furthermore, the effort to rewrite as much of the TeX implementation as possible in Lua is perplexing. Very little of the TeX implementation has been rewritten in Lua. (Assuming you're talking of LuaTeX itself and not the "TeX without TeX" wiki page, which is just for demonstration.) LuaTeX starts with the WEB (Pascal) code of TeX, manually translated into C (see e.g. [LINK] ), and, additionally, hooks are added: callbacks that can be written in Lua, and which have access to the internal data structures. (By the way, SILE is a separate typesetting system (unrelated to TeX) that is actually written in Lua, and re-implements some of the TeX algorithms in Lua, I think. You can see this talk by its author about it: [VIDEO] )
A couple of the author's talks are also online: • [VIDEO] [FOSDEM 2015, "Introducing SILE: A New Typesetting System"] • [LINK] [GRANSHAN Conference 2015, "Global typesetting with SILE"]