Dr. Robert Sapolsky's lecture about Biological Underpinnings of Religiosity
Aprendiendo Juntos2 HN recommenders · 2014–2025
874K views · lecture · evergreen · Uploaded 2011-12-30
Robert Sapolsky's Stanford lecture on the biological underpinnings of religiosity, from his human behavioral biology course. It covers theories linking religion to stress, and schizotypal traits.
Recommended when religion, mental health or psychedelics come up, for Sapolsky's biological framing.
1:03:43How to Speak
MIT OpenCourseWare
1:16:17In Search Of A Flat Earth
Folding Ideas
57:151. Introduction to Human Behavioral Biology
Stanford
1:21:52LEADERSHIP LAB: The Craft of Writing Effectively
UChicago Social Sciences
1:11:40MIT's Pathway to Fusion Energy (IAP 2017) - Zach Hartwig
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
52:29Stanford's Sapolsky On Depression in U.S. (Full Lecture)
Stanford
54:56Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 01 "THE MORAL SIDE OF MURDER"
Harvard University
52:07What Bodies Think About: Bioelectric Computation Outside the Nervous System - NeurIPS 2018
The Artificial Intelligence Channel
4 comments from Hacker News
"Get it wrong, and we call it a cult. Get it right, in the right time and the right place, and maybe, for the next few millennia, people won't have to go to work on your birthday." - Dr. Robert Sapolsky [VIDEO]
You're exagerating the parent's claims. It is possible that religion can reduce stress, and help against depression without being an absolute defense. Our brain may just be wired that way. This doesn't even involve God or the supernatural actually existing for these effects to be real. You should check some of the talks, and lectures by Robert Sapolsky (an atheist), who advances this in several of them. Biological Underpinnings of Religiosity: [VIDEO] Religion Is Nature's Antidepressant: [LINK]
Here's a lecture by Robert Sapolsky where he goes into some theories involving schizotypal individuals (and other mental disorders) and culture: [VIDEO] Long story short, the theory goes that being schizotypal (but not full-blown schizophrenic) could be an advantageous trait in human society, usually by filling some spiritual, ritual, or religious role in the group. These people are high status in their societies, and have many chances for passing on their genes.
Biology, chemical biology and parts of non-traditional chemistry, are some of the most political and elitist fields outside of social sciences. How and what is taught is not necessarily science based only, let alone, who gets in the PhD programs in the first place. Organismic and Evolutionary Biologists, like Robert Sapolsky, are right in the middle of culture wars, and always on the same side: [VIDEO]